Next lesson
From demo to decision
Score demo answers on one scale, separate what was shown from what was said, ask the pricing and procurement questions early, and run a proof of concept before deciding.
Lesson
Buying · Lesson 2 of 3 · 3 min read
Straight answer
Turn each criterion into one requirement your team can test, mark each as a must-have or a nice-to-have, and set your weights before the first demo, so every vendor is scored against your needs rather than its pitch.
Requirements written after a demo tend to describe the product that was just shown. Writing them first, from a fixed set of criteria, keeps every vendor on the same list. The seven criteria this site scores are a reasonable starting set for teams asking our buyer question; drop or add rows to fit yours.
Mark each requirement as a must-have or a nice-to-have. A vendor that cannot meet a must-have leaves the shortlist, whatever its other scores. Keep must-haves few, or no tool will pass.
Give the nice-to-haves weights that add up to 100. Our weights are data reach without new ingestion 25%, intel-to-detection speed 20%, continuous hunting 20%, time to first value 15%, coverage measurement against ATT&CK 8%, rule lifecycle 7% and buyer transparency 5%; yours may differ. Enter yours in the calculator to see how the six tools order on our scores with your priorities, and use the same weights when you score demo answers.
For each requirement, agree what a 5, a 3 and a 1 look like before the demos. This site uses five levels, from 5, documented in detail with specifics, to 1, not addressed or built for a different job. A shared scale keeps scores consistent across reviewers and across vendors.
Seven requirements on one page is enough for a first round. The detail belongs in the proof of concept, which the buyer note Running a proof of concept for hunting on existing data covers.
Next lesson
Score demo answers on one scale, separate what was shown from what was said, ask the pricing and procurement questions early, and run a proof of concept before deciding.
Editorial assessment · Desk research from public vendor material, last reviewed September 2026